Content Dam De En Articles Print Volume 107 Issue 3 Science Tech The Outlier Cancer We Re Behind The Curve Leftcolumn Article Thumbnailimage File

The outlier cancer: We're behind the curve

March 2, 2017
Most dental offices are still using methods from the 1800s when screening for oral cancer. But with the advent of new technologies, Whitman says, it's time to change the status quo.

Most dental offices are still using methods from the 1800s when screening for oral cancer. But with the advent of new technologies, Whitman says, it's time to change the status quo.


When you think of dentistry,
you think of hygiene, beautiful cosmetics, lasers, CAD/CAM, and other advanced technologies to make treatments easier. The last thing that comes to mind is cancer. Patients associate going to the dentist with semiannual cleanings, veneers, teeth whitening, orthodontics, dentures, or emergency visits for toothaches.

Dentistry has been adopting technology over the past decade in the areas of laser dentistry, sleep medicine, pain-free whitening, crowns in a day, CAD/CAM, and more to offer patients. These procedures are becoming the standard of care in today's dental office. But even with all of these technological advances, most dental offices are still using methods from the 1800s when screening for oral cancer (if they even do it at all). (1) Dentistry is way behind the curve with regard to cancer screenings.

Oral cancer incidence rates have increased every year over the past eight years in the United States, and it continues to rise today. A decade ago, in 2006, the oral cancer incidence rate was about 30,000 cases per year, resulting in 7,430 deaths. (2) This year, the oral cancer incidence rate is expected to increase to approximately 50,000 cases and has resulted in almost 10,000 deaths in the Unites States. (3) To put that in perspective, one American dies every hour from oral cancer.

The traditional obvious risk factors for oral cancer include tobacco (smokeless and smoked) and excessive alcohol consumption. Consuming both alcohol and tobacco at the same time results in a synergistic effect, increasing the risk for oral cancer by 30-fold. (3) The newest risk factor for oral cancer is the human papillomavirus (HPV). Many clinicians tend to avoid this topic, yet HPV is the fastest-growing risk factor3 and results in younger patients being diagnosed with oral cancer. HPV-positive oral cancers have increased 225% in the past three decades. (4) These risk factors-along with just the sheer bad luck of that 7% of the population that develops cancer for no reason—have resulted in oral cancer being one of the few cancers that has continued to rise in incidence over the past decade. (3)

Regardless of the cause of the cancer, early discovery has been proven to save lives. The survival rates for cancers are much higher if the cancer is discovered in its early stages. The same is true for oral cancer. If oral cancer is found early, patients have an 80%-90% survival rate, while late discovery results in a survival rate of 34%–50%. (3) The great news is that most cancers are found early. Breast cancer, cervical cancer, prostate cancer, and many others are all being discovered in their early stages, resulting in a dramatic increase in survival rates. This increase in survival rates is due to preventive measures such as regular mammograms, Pap smears, prostate exams, etc. (3)

RELATED: Oral cancer screening: To charge or not to charge?

Oral cancer is the outlier in the category of early detection. The vast majority, about two-thirds, of the patients who are diagnosed with oral cancer are typically diagnosed in later stages, when the survival rate is less than 50%. (3) These numbers should stress the importance of early discovery for all cancers, specifically oral cancer. Oral cancer is behind the curve primarily due to the fact that screening protocols haven't changed over the years. Dentists are screening for oral cancer the same way they did in the 1880s, when Ulysses S. Grant's dentist missed detecting Grant's oral cancer, which led to his early death.

Most professionals are able to recognize trends and develop game plans to determine what they can do to change those trends. We should be asking ourselves how to diagnose oral cancers at an earlier stage. In the past, many other cancers have had the same trend as oral cancer. With a simple change in protocol and incorporation of new technology, doctors changed their approach and discovered the cancers at earlier stages, resulting in increased survival rates and better outcomes for their diagnosed patients. In The Life of Reason from 1905, George Santayana said, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." Let's take a look at other cancers and how we can learn from them.

In the mid-20th century, cervical cancer was one of the leading causes of cancer among women. It steadily rose in incidence rate to more than 40,000 annual cases. (3) With late-stage discovery, cervical cancer had a low survival rate. Medical professionals realized their approach needed to change, so in 1952 an annual Pap smear was recommended. Over the next few decades, cervical cancer was being found much earlier-even in its precancerous stage-and the death rate decreased by 70% over that time frame. (3) Many people gave credit to the Pap smear test for changing the trends, but it actually had a very poor accuracy rate, especially in its first 30 years of use. (3) It was not only the Pap test that changed the trends; the doctors who implemented an advancement from their traditional screening method should be given the credit as well. Technological advancements are all around us, but the trends will continue until someone embraces those advancements to create change.

Breast cancer and prostate cancer are two additional examples. Since mammograms were implemented in 1972, the breast cancer death rate has dropped precipitously. (3) Women now understand the value of an annual mammogram and its potential to save lives. On the other hand, men see the value of prostate tests. Since the controversial PSA test was implemented in 1986, the prostate cancer death rate has decreased by 45%.3 These are two simple tests, implemented due to a negative trend, that have impacted cancer death rates drastically.

Looking again at oral cancer, studies suggest that patients are requesting screenings. In 2007 a public opinion survey of 1,000 adults was conducted to learn more about what they were expecting from their dental providers. A majority (85%) of survey respondents indicated that it was important to them that their dentist check for oral cancer. (1) Patients are much more educated these days and preventive in nature; they are getting their annual cancer screenings from their physicians, so why not from their dentists too? The startling result from the survey was that only half of these patients indicated that their dentists actually screened them for oral cancer.

Maybe I am an outlier in thinking that when things are not working, we have to change the way we are doing them. Or, maybe dentistry is the true outlier in not wanting to take a new approach to a cancer that needs its trends reversed. Every day we wait to change our protocol, patients are dying from oral cancer due to late-stage discovery.

Wayne Dyer gave us a great quote that is appropriate here: "If you change the way you look at things, the things you look at begin to change." Change the way you screen for oral cancer, and you just may save someone's life.

References

1. Anderson SJ. The public opinion survey on dentistry-Are you offering what patients are really looking for now? J Cosmetic Dent. 2008;24(3):190-193.

2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2006. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2006/cancer-facts-and-figures-2006.pdf. Accessed February 15, 2017.

3. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2017. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2017/cancer-facts-and-figures-2017.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2017.

4. Pytynia KB, Dahlstrom KR, Sturgis EM. Epidemiology of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014;50(5):380-386. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.019.

With a master's in biomedical engineering, Robert J. Whitman, MSE, began his career at MD Anderson Cancer Center where he developed a passion for early cancer diagnostics. He is the cofounder and CEO of Forward Science, a biotech company with an oral cancer screening product, OralID, and dry mouth treatment, SalivaMax. He speaks nationally on oral cancer and early discovery. Contact him at [email protected] or visit ForwardScience.com.

RELATED:

Forward Science releases upgraded OralID 2.0 oral screening device

Staying ahead of the grim reaper: Oral cancer screening tools can help save lives

Sponsored Recommendations

Clinical Study: OraCare Reduced Probing Depths 4450% Better than Brushing Alone

Good oral hygiene is essential to preserving gum health. In this study the improvements seen were statistically superior at reducing pocket depth than brushing alone (control ...

Clincial Study: OraCare Proven to Improve Gingival Health by 604% in just a 6 Week Period

A new clinical study reveals how OraCare showed improvement in the whole mouth as bleeding, plaque reduction, interproximal sites, and probing depths were all evaluated. All areas...

Chlorine Dioxide Efficacy Against Pathogens and How it Compares to Chlorhexidine

Explore our library of studies to learn about the historical application of chlorine dioxide, efficacy against pathogens, how it compares to chlorhexidine and more.

Whitepaper: The Blueprint for Practice Growth

With just a few changes, you can significantly boost revenue and grow your practice. In this white paper, Dr. Katz covers: Establishing consistent diagnosis protocols, Addressing...