Lets Support Both the AGD and ADA!

Dec. 1, 1995
It was with great consternation that I read Dr. Hugh F. Doherty`s editorial, "Shame on Them," in your October 1995 issue. Dr. Doherty has spiced his article with words that give an incorrect impression to those who may not be fully informed as to the facts concerning the AGD`s dropping of the ADA-membership requirement.

It was with great consternation that I read Dr. Hugh F. Doherty`s editorial, "Shame on Them," in your October 1995 issue. Dr. Doherty has spiced his article with words that give an incorrect impression to those who may not be fully informed as to the facts concerning the AGD`s dropping of the ADA-membership requirement.

The overwhelming majority of AGD members also are ADA members and staunchly support the ADA. Many of us work tirelessly for the ADA on a constituent and component level. To say that the action of dedicated and conscientious individuals was "frivolous" is unfair and demeaning. This action had been deliberated for several years; numerous studies were undertaken to determine the reason why young dentists were not already joining the ADA.

More than 42 percent of the graduating dental class were not joining the ADA. This lack of interest in the ADA had nothing to do with the AGD. These studies were reported to the ADA`s Council on Membership in early 1994. The ADA did not give this information to their delegates to the ADA House, which met in New Orleans in October 1994. Those delegates were, instead, given limited information upon which they could make only an uninformed decision. This lack of action by the ADA then led to the AGD bringing to its House the resolution that the oral and maxillofacial surgeons (AAMOS) already had in place; i.e., dropping the ADA-membership requirement.

The closed ballot was requested because AGD delegates were being harassed by ADA component and constituent officers. There were outright threats that, if the AGD passed this resolution, that individuals who voted for it and were active in both organizations would be disenfranchised within the ADA tripartite structure. It should not be lost sight of that a secret ballot is considered important enough that it is guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution, so that individuals can vote their conscience without fear of recriminations.

I urge Dr. Doherty that, before he takes the space that had heretofore been used for valuable, practical clinical information, he research his facts. I also would urge all of my colleagues to support two great dental organizations, the AGD and the ADA.

Jay S. Orlikoff, DDS, FAGD

Centereach, NY

Sponsored Recommendations

How to choose your diagnostic imaging technology

If any car could take you from A to B, what made you choose the one you’re driving? Once you determine your wants and needs, purchasing decisions become granular regarding personal...

A picture is worth a thousand words - Increase case acceptance with dental technology

How can you strengthen case acceptance at your practice? One way is by investing in advanced technology that enables you to make a stronger case for treatment and to provide faster...

Discover technology solutions to improve case acceptance

Case acceptance is central to the oral health of your patients and the financial health of your practice. Click here to discover how the right investments in technology can help...

What to expect when you invest in equipment and technology

Hear from 3 seasoned Patterson representatives as they share their firsthand knowledge of what an investment in equipment and technology means to a practice.