Numbers are confusing

Dec. 1, 1997
I found Dr. James Pride`s article in the September issue somewhat confusing. He states that "Employers are cutting back on dental coverage en masse.O Dr. Pride then goes on to say that 20 years ago, 9 percent of employers provided coverage while today the number is close to 48 percent. I believe that this trend demonstrates an increase rather than a cut back.

I found Dr. James Pride`s article in the September issue somewhat confusing. He states that "Employers are cutting back on dental coverage en masse.O Dr. Pride then goes on to say that 20 years ago, 9 percent of employers provided coverage while today the number is close to 48 percent. I believe that this trend demonstrates an increase rather than a cut back.

Steven R. Duffin, DDS, MBA

Salem, OR

Editor?s note: Sorry for the confusion. We goofed. Dr. Pride?s statement should read: OJust 10 years ago, 69 percent of all employers provided their employees with some form of dental coverage. Today, less than 48 percent offer a dental plan in any form.O

Sponsored Recommendations

Office Managers: A Glowing Review

Office managers are the heart of every practice, valued for their compassion, dedication, and exceptional skill. This year’s Spa Day giveaway highlighted their impact—from problem...

Care Beyond the Chair: A Trusted Provider for All Patients

Just as no treatment plan is exactly the same, neither are any two patients’ financial situations. Financial barriers can stand in the way of a patient receiving the care they...

Success in the Cloud: Benefits for Multilocation Practices

One practice, multiple locations. It sounds pretty simple, but we know it requires an intentional, multilayered strategy to be successful. Discover how implementing cloud-based...

4 Ways to Increase Case Acceptance & Practice Efficiencies

Cost limitations can be a big barrier to patients’ acceptance of dental care treatments. Click to learn more about Patterson CarePay+, a single, comprehensive financing option...