Regarding Carol Tekavec

May 1, 2000
At the conclusion of an otherwise excellent piece on scaling and root-planing (February Dental Economics), Carol Tekavec misinforms readers concerning the procedure and subsequent coding of D4355-Full Mouth Debridement to Enable Compre-hensive Periodontal Evaluation and Diagnosis. It is well-defined in CDT-3/2000 and is, in fact, appropriate care in certain circumstances.

George E. Valentine, DDS, MS

Middletown, Conn.

At the conclusion of an otherwise excellent piece on scaling and root-planing (February Dental Economics), Carol Tekavec misinforms readers concerning the procedure and subsequent coding of D4355-Full Mouth Debridement to Enable Compre-hensive Periodontal Evaluation and Diagnosis. It is well-defined in CDT-3/2000 and is, in fact, appropriate care in certain circumstances.

It has long been the position of some major insurers with managed care plans to deny this procedure for fear of abuse by substitution for prophylaxis. We have never seen accurate studies confirming this abuse pattern and consider that particular thinking anecdotal and unscientific.

Realistically in many cases, dentists cannot determine pocket depths and the true extent of periodontal disease without removal of subgingival calculus. Adding to the conundrum is the plain fact that we cannot even prescribe prophylaxis without completing proper examination and diagnosis. The PSR technique, in combination with a comprehensive oral evaluation (Code D0150) allows a screening methodology to proceed with more definitive data collection and disease determination. Final pocket depths are determined after the gross subgingival scaling and the proper treatment plan is formulated.

I do not believe we would have defined and documented this procedure with its code if it were not "viable" or a "standard of care." It is necessary and appropriate and can easily be validated with radiographs, intraoral pictures, and subsequent charting.

Sponsored Recommendations

Clinical Study: OraCare Reduced Probing Depths 4450% Better than Brushing Alone

Good oral hygiene is essential to preserving gum health. In this study the improvements seen were statistically superior at reducing pocket depth than brushing alone (control ...

Clincial Study: OraCare Proven to Improve Gingival Health by 604% in just a 6 Week Period

A new clinical study reveals how OraCare showed improvement in the whole mouth as bleeding, plaque reduction, interproximal sites, and probing depths were all evaluated. All areas...

Chlorine Dioxide Efficacy Against Pathogens and How it Compares to Chlorhexidine

Explore our library of studies to learn about the historical application of chlorine dioxide, efficacy against pathogens, how it compares to chlorhexidine and more.

Enhancing Your Practice Growth with Chairside Milling

When practice growth and predictability matter...Get more output with less input discover chairside milling.